I was reading the comments on this exploit story on AppleInsider. I loved lkrupp’s comment (below). The first paragraph might just be the best and simplest explanation for how to avoid virus and malware problems. (if you use Windows then you’ll need to substitute Microsoft approved or the likes for App Store).
Several of the other comments are laced with common sense. “So the danger is not that someone outside can get into your machine: the danger is that anyone who has physical access to your machine can take it over.”
The second paragraph is just a nice description of the evolution of hacking and how its evolved from “glory” into a “business model”.
Don’t worry about it. Just keep using common sense when downloading software. Download only from trusted sources and companies like the App Store. Don’t click on anything that promises magical things. If it sounds too good to be true it IS. Like all the other chicken little reports about these things they rarely actually materialize to become a major problem.
Above all don’t listen to the paranoid crowd’s predictions of the Apocalypse. They show up here every time one of these reports gets out, wringing their hands and running around with their hair on fire. Truth is hackers these days are in it for the money. They like attacking corporations where the ROI is highest. Individual’s machines not so much because the data is of limited value. It’s not like the old days where hackers did their thing for the glory of their reputations. Today hacking is a business model.
This quote from Rana Foroohar on CNN this weekend makes one stop and think. A similar comment related to Connecticut (similar GDP to Greece) effectively bailing out any of the smaller southern US states every year.
It’s not that the economy of Greece itself matters so much–China creates a new Greece every six weeks–it’s that a Greek exit from the Eurozone calls into question the entire European experiment.
Its easy to understate the importance of small economic areas, but they matter immensely within their geographic and economic context within which they belong no matter what the bean counters think.
My wife just came across this term on a recent trip back to Japan. Garakei or another version, Gara-phone.
It literally means “Galapagos Cell Phone”. The backdrop actually goes back to Charles Darwin and how he made the Galapagos Islands famous for uniquely eveolving animal forms and this formed the basis of his “Origin of Species”.
Recently I’ve been hearing about a Japanese electronic device called a “garakei ガラケイ”. Mystified by this katakana word, which I assumed to be at least partially the transcription of some foreign term, I set about trying to find out more about it.
It wasn’t hard to discover (here and here) that the word basically means “Galapagos cell phone”. What a strange name for a kind of cell phone!
If we recall back to before 2007 Japan had their own industry leading and very efficient phones which had apps and characteristics that were unique to Japan. iPhone entered in 2007 and smart phones are mainstream around the world now including Japan.
However there remain a diehard group including my wifes dad who continue to use the unique Japanese phones bearing the pre-2007 style. These are the Gara-phones and hence the reference to Galapagos.
More from language log.
The idea is that, like the animals and birds of the Galapagos Islands, which developed unique traits in isolation from mainland species so as to fit their special environment, the garakei ガラケイhas features that were developed solely in and for people of the Japanese islands without regard to global IT trends. Thus, garakei are not known or used in places outside Japan. Naturally, they have some features that are shared with cell phones elsewhere (e.g., built-in camera), but they also have functions that do not exist outside of Japan.
Maybe there are just some things that cannot be controlled.
Despite massive government intervention, the Chinese stock market is collapsing in light of an overbought bubble.
China’s central bank stepped up state support for sinking stocks on Wednesday, as investors rushed to sell what they still could after a fresh wave of share suspensions that have now halted trading in half the market.
The renewed selling followed another round of share suspensions overnight, which have now halted trading in 1,476 stocks — or more than 50 per cent all listed companies on China’s two main exchanges. The suspensions have frozen $2.6tn worth of equity, according to Bloomberg calculations.
This interview with Thomas Piketty by Die Ziet is a landmark. As the interview rightly points out this 700+ page best seller has not been read beyond probably Page 26 by most of the purchasers. This is obvious to me by the book reviews.
However this interview has two main aspects of interest:
- it highlights some economic history, history meaning anything previous to the last quarter, and that in which most folks have no interest. This stuff is not in the history books. Economic history is boring and unless you read Niall Ferguson, Thomas Piketty, or Kenneth Rogoff will not mean much. His central point in this interview is that Germany has never re-paid their country debts. They have either inflated themselves out of debt or just plain not paid. In other words they have, in his view, no moral right to the position they take against Greece.
- there is a symbience between the European countries that require a symbiotic agreement to move forward. To take the Grexit approach would simply alert the Spains, Portugals, and Italys to the potential to save money by reneging.
This subject is important. Consider California or Michigan seceding because of their debts. A domino game would be set off that would result in chaos within currency markets. To bring it closer to home, going on vacation would become a currency guessing game.
I actually don’t like the Eurozone but I think its important for the future becuase it brings the world closer to economic similarity if not equivalence.
In closing the orginal Die Ziet interview on Medium has been closed due to
I am currently in touch with DIE ZEIT to ensure my compliance with German copyright law. Updates will follow very soon. The original German interview with Thomas Piketty can be found here
Clearly since this morning (July 6th, 2015) someone ‘big’ got to Piketty and/or Die Ziet. Piketty is not exactly on my side of the political fence but I admire him for his tenacious focus on research and facts.
Here is the English translation that has since been taken down.
Go Thomas Piketty.
The whole music streaming thing is becoming one of the the next big things. There are lots of apps out there and when Apple announced Apple Music it seemed clear they could leap above the fray.
This piece at recode exemplifies what has bothered me. Simplicity.
In the battle of the streaming music services, when most of them can claim the same number of tracks, offline listening, a multi-platform approach and some basic cloud services, the standout feature might just be the least sexy: Simplicity.
Of course there is complexity to deal with:
- my existing Apple Music
- Internet Radio (why now)
- Social media interactions with musicians
Somehow Apple launched so many features simultaneously that its confusing, and more importantly killed their opportunity to take the lead.
I think that companies including Apple do not appreciate the ability of folks to adapt. I have seen it from LP’s to cassettes to CD’s to mp3’s to iTunes. No problem. Just make it clear that the next step is to pay per month for streaming. End of job.
The complexity of British DJ’s, American headset manufacturers and social media interaction with musicians is completley ignoring the fact i want to listen to music.
Lastly … the elephant in the room – fidelity. A friend recently pointed me to tidal.com. It is double the price at $20 pm but the CD sound quality is superb. I have tried multiple tracks on Apple Music and on Tidal. It is night and day.
Instead of breadth of confusing features Apple should lead the way with simple streaming of music and include a lossless CD option. The Apple base would accept that naturally and life would be easier.
For now I don’t see Apple Music getting traction and taking users from Spotify/ Rdio etc becuase Apple Music is too complicated.
Social media meets lobbying meets activist meets Industry Powerhouse.
Taylor Swift conducted what was obviously a well thought through campaign on her blog, presumably because 140 characters sometimes is just not enough. (Go blogging, but I digress).
To bring everyone up to speed, the Apple Music streaming service was proposed to launch with a 3 month trial period. This is longer than the normal 1 month trial. The kicker was that Apple were not planning to pay an artist royalty during that 3 month period.
Apple had dealt with that potential dissonance with a 2 – 3 % increase to 30% being the payment Apple would pay to the musicians following the 3 month trial.
Taylor was able to talk about the poor “young songwriter” and make the case that the non payment to them during the 3 months was a huge deal financially to those artists.
Mission acconplished. Eddie Cue tweeted
“We hear you @taylorswift13 and indie artists. Love, Apple” (seriously she is #13?)
With days to go before the launch of Apple Music, the company was facing an intensifying chorus of criticism from artists and independent record labels about key terms of its new $9.99-a-month subscription service. Singer Taylor Swift said in a blogpost that it was “shocking” and “disappointing” that Apple was refusing to pay artists for music carried during a free three-month trial period for users.
Yet within a day of the rebuke from Ms Swift, Apple changed its tune and announced that it would pay for every single stream. Eddy Cue, the group’s senior vice-president of internet software and services, tweeted: “We hear you @taylorswift13 and indie artists. Love, Apple.”
Relevance to Bankwatch:
There are so many issues at play here its hard to know where to begin. Here are some I thought of:
- Apple didn’t properly externally consult and think through the business model of Apple Music
- Apple bean counters created a model that in theory over compensated artists but only if they are successful for a long time. I didnt do the math, but I am estimating that in a PV/ FV calculation it takes a long time to recoup three months working for free
- Apple saw an opportunity to support a Spotify hater and be on the side of good (the sceptical view)
- Apple over-estimated an issue that ‘might’ blow over
- Taylor went corporate with help of her ‘people’ using social media that post was a very well constructed piece that placed the product (Taylor) selflessly and somewhat tongue in cheek at the top of the pile (“Thankfully I am on my fifth album and can support myself, my band, crew, and entire management team by playing live shows”)
Something is changing here in terms of industry power shift. Music has been on the back foot for 20 years. This is one small move for music.
What is more intersting is whether this is a one off or whether other industries than music might see such influence. For now I believe this is a one off that is related to the influence embedded in the Taylor Swift brand. (Eat your heart out Kanye).
Taylor Swift probably hit JayZ status in terms of indutry influence though and there could be impications for Apple Vs Tidal that are going on here.