<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maybe Google is smarter than we think?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thebankwatch.com/2006/07/03/maybe-google-is-smarter-than-we-think/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thebankwatch.com/2006/07/03/maybe-google-is-smarter-than-we-think/</link>
	<description>Tracking the evolution of financial institutions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:48:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://thebankwatch.com/2006/07/03/maybe-google-is-smarter-than-we-think/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Colin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 02:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bankwatch.wordpress.com/2006/07/03/maybe-google-is-smarter-than-we-think/#comment-149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re Edwards, I would question his motivations.

However I will give you the &quot;little things&quot; point. 

The larger point, I am trying to get at, probably rather poorly with my rather provocative statement, is that the unmarketing concept as a divergent approach to brainstorming, will require convergent thinking at some point to get specific.  I find the current trend of conferences needs a bit more focus.  Recently in Toronto I attended the MESH conference, and it was not dissimilar to Gnomedex in terms of schedule, even without Edwards.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re Edwards, I would question his motivations.</p>
<p>However I will give you the &#8220;little things&#8221; point. </p>
<p>The larger point, I am trying to get at, probably rather poorly with my rather provocative statement, is that the unmarketing concept as a divergent approach to brainstorming, will require convergent thinking at some point to get specific.  I find the current trend of conferences needs a bit more focus.  Recently in Toronto I attended the MESH conference, and it was not dissimilar to Gnomedex in terms of schedule, even without Edwards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Scoble</title>
		<link>http://thebankwatch.com/2006/07/03/maybe-google-is-smarter-than-we-think/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Scoble]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 02:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bankwatch.wordpress.com/2006/07/03/maybe-google-is-smarter-than-we-think/#comment-148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Same old, same old? I don&#039;t remember when a future presidential candidate (and former senator) showed up to Gnomedex, or any blogging/geek conference that cost only $500 to attend.

Would Google have learned something? You never know where the next idea is gonna come from. But one thing I have learned: it&#039;s the small things that&#039;ll kill you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same old, same old? I don&#8217;t remember when a future presidential candidate (and former senator) showed up to Gnomedex, or any blogging/geek conference that cost only $500 to attend.</p>
<p>Would Google have learned something? You never know where the next idea is gonna come from. But one thing I have learned: it&#8217;s the small things that&#8217;ll kill you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

