<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wells Fargo launches second blog, and let the readers decide</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thebankwatch.com/2006/09/06/wells-fargo-launches-second-blog-and-let-the-readers-decide/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thebankwatch.com/2006/09/06/wells-fargo-launches-second-blog-and-let-the-readers-decide/</link>
	<description>Tracking the evolution of financial services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 08:01:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://thebankwatch.com/2006/09/06/wells-fargo-launches-second-blog-and-let-the-readers-decide/#comment-1787</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Colin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 18:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bankwatch.wordpress.com/2006/09/06/wells-fargo-launches-second-blog-and-let-the-readers-decide/#comment-1787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for taking the time to respond Brent, and I think we are aligned again (thats ususally what happens!).  Re formatting, it was something weird in WP so I removed the link on GBH.  This was the link:
http://blog.wellsfargo.com/GuidedByHistory/

Colin]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for taking the time to respond Brent, and I think we are aligned again (thats ususally what happens!).  Re formatting, it was something weird in WP so I removed the link on GBH.  This was the link:<br />
<a href="http://blog.wellsfargo.com/GuidedByHistory/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.wellsfargo.com/GuidedByHistory/</a></p>
<p>Colin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent</title>
		<link>http://thebankwatch.com/2006/09/06/wells-fargo-launches-second-blog-and-let-the-readers-decide/#comment-1786</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 18:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bankwatch.wordpress.com/2006/09/06/wells-fargo-launches-second-blog-and-let-the-readers-decide/#comment-1786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On another note, sorry for making the html formatting go all screwy on my comment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On another note, sorry for making the html formatting go all screwy on my comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent</title>
		<link>http://thebankwatch.com/2006/09/06/wells-fargo-launches-second-blog-and-let-the-readers-decide/#comment-1785</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 18:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bankwatch.wordpress.com/2006/09/06/wells-fargo-launches-second-blog-and-let-the-readers-decide/#comment-1785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We are playing blog-tennis. I originally posted this to &lt;a href=&quot;http://opensourcecu.com/articles/2006/09/05/wells-fargo-launches-second-blog#comments&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;our blog&lt;/a&gt;, but I&#039;ll repost here:

You’re right Colin, my question is really more about the implementation than the overall concepts.

They’re both great ideas in theory – the idea of a bank (who’s brand is built around their longevity) blogging about preparedness by looking through history is great positioning. I just wonder about the kind of community that can really grow.

When I look through the blog, 90% of the posts have zero comments. This says readers are less than engaged. When I click “Get Involved” it takes me to an error page.

As a move of pure positioning GBH works. And as an internal demonstrative tool, “See VPs? Blogging isn’t scary,” it’s effective. But as consumer community engagement, it’s lacking.

The strategy seems more Wells Fargo-focused, and less consumer-focused.

Meanwhile, I have nothing but optimism for the Student LoanDown. I hope they dig into their audience and put some meaningful stuff out there that the kids want to read. I’ll be excitedly keeping my eye on it.

And either way, I applaud Wells Fargo for experimenting with blogging. There’s only one way to learn, and they’re doing it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are playing blog-tennis. I originally posted this to <a href="http://opensourcecu.com/articles/2006/09/05/wells-fargo-launches-second-blog#comments" rel="nofollow">our blog</a>, but I&#8217;ll repost here:</p>
<p>You’re right Colin, my question is really more about the implementation than the overall concepts.</p>
<p>They’re both great ideas in theory – the idea of a bank (who’s brand is built around their longevity) blogging about preparedness by looking through history is great positioning. I just wonder about the kind of community that can really grow.</p>
<p>When I look through the blog, 90% of the posts have zero comments. This says readers are less than engaged. When I click “Get Involved” it takes me to an error page.</p>
<p>As a move of pure positioning GBH works. And as an internal demonstrative tool, “See VPs? Blogging isn’t scary,” it’s effective. But as consumer community engagement, it’s lacking.</p>
<p>The strategy seems more Wells Fargo-focused, and less consumer-focused.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, I have nothing but optimism for the Student LoanDown. I hope they dig into their audience and put some meaningful stuff out there that the kids want to read. I’ll be excitedly keeping my eye on it.</p>
<p>And either way, I applaud Wells Fargo for experimenting with blogging. There’s only one way to learn, and they’re doing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

