<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Banks editing Wikipedia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thebankwatch.com/2007/08/22/banks-editing-wikipedia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thebankwatch.com/2007/08/22/banks-editing-wikipedia/</link>
	<description>Tracking the evolution of financial services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 18:05:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Can't Say - SHHHHH</title>
		<link>http://thebankwatch.com/2007/08/22/banks-editing-wikipedia/#comment-15862</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Can't Say - SHHHHH]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 20:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bankwatch.wordpress.com/2007/08/22/banks-editing-wikipedia/#comment-15862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I work for a bank and recently updated it to reflect our bank, this will become increasingly important in the future!  Thanks for all the great articles Bankwatch...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work for a bank and recently updated it to reflect our bank, this will become increasingly important in the future!  Thanks for all the great articles Bankwatch&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: manny januszczak</title>
		<link>http://thebankwatch.com/2007/08/22/banks-editing-wikipedia/#comment-15802</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[manny januszczak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 22:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bankwatch.wordpress.com/2007/08/22/banks-editing-wikipedia/#comment-15802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Peach.   
I had 1 dollar to fall down.   bye]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Peach.<br />
I had 1 dollar to fall down.   bye</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://thebankwatch.com/2007/08/22/banks-editing-wikipedia/#comment-15796</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 20:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bankwatch.wordpress.com/2007/08/22/banks-editing-wikipedia/#comment-15796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Colin - I think you may be reading too much into that list.  It just gives the total # of edits on any topic, not necessarily edits to their own page.  Clicking on the checkbox next to the IP range and then the &quot;Wikipedia Edits Ahoy&quot; button hidden near the bottom of the page will bring up all the topics that were edited....   I tried it with the Deutsche Bank IP range that was the first result, and very few edits are for banking terms (Derek Jeter, The Simpsons, Nathan&#039;s Hot Dog Eating Constest, etc)...

So maybe not as scandalous as editing their own entries - but there sure seem to be a lot banks that are having trouble keeping their employees occupied with &#039;real&#039; work.


Link to the specific edits: http://wikiscanner.virgil.gr/f.php?ip1=160.83.72.0-73.255]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colin &#8211; I think you may be reading too much into that list.  It just gives the total # of edits on any topic, not necessarily edits to their own page.  Clicking on the checkbox next to the IP range and then the &#8220;Wikipedia Edits Ahoy&#8221; button hidden near the bottom of the page will bring up all the topics that were edited&#8230;.   I tried it with the Deutsche Bank IP range that was the first result, and very few edits are for banking terms (Derek Jeter, The Simpsons, Nathan&#8217;s Hot Dog Eating Constest, etc)&#8230;</p>
<p>So maybe not as scandalous as editing their own entries &#8211; but there sure seem to be a lot banks that are having trouble keeping their employees occupied with &#8216;real&#8217; work.</p>
<p>Link to the specific edits: <a href="http://wikiscanner.virgil.gr/f.php?ip1=160.83.72.0-73.255" rel="nofollow">http://wikiscanner.virgil.gr/f.php?ip1=160.83.72.0-73.255</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://thebankwatch.com/2007/08/22/banks-editing-wikipedia/#comment-15795</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Colin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 20:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bankwatch.wordpress.com/2007/08/22/banks-editing-wikipedia/#comment-15795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Brent .... I actually don&#039;t associate good or bad with this relative to Banks just yet, mainly because the stat isn&#039;t clearly defined, per Ron&#039;s comment.  Just interesting.  Its certainly good in the sense that those Banks are active online .... where are the others??]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Brent &#8230;. I actually don&#8217;t associate good or bad with this relative to Banks just yet, mainly because the stat isn&#8217;t clearly defined, per Ron&#8217;s comment.  Just interesting.  Its certainly good in the sense that those Banks are active online &#8230;. where are the others??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://thebankwatch.com/2007/08/22/banks-editing-wikipedia/#comment-15776</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Colin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 18:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bankwatch.wordpress.com/2007/08/22/banks-editing-wikipedia/#comment-15776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Ron ...  I believe this means those Banks are editing their own pages.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ron &#8230;  I believe this means those Banks are editing their own pages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rshevlin</title>
		<link>http://thebankwatch.com/2007/08/22/banks-editing-wikipedia/#comment-15775</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rshevlin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 18:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bankwatch.wordpress.com/2007/08/22/banks-editing-wikipedia/#comment-15775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry to be dense, but I&#039;m not sure I really understand what the page you link to is saying. 

Are those the number of edits someone from the bank&#039;s  IP address has made to their OWN bank&#039;s Wikipedia page? Or ANY Wikipedia page? 

Could this just be a case of someone (or more likely, someones) from those banks who are just simply active editors/contributors to Wikipedia?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to be dense, but I&#8217;m not sure I really understand what the page you link to is saying. </p>
<p>Are those the number of edits someone from the bank&#8217;s  IP address has made to their OWN bank&#8217;s Wikipedia page? Or ANY Wikipedia page? </p>
<p>Could this just be a case of someone (or more likely, someones) from those banks who are just simply active editors/contributors to Wikipedia?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent</title>
		<link>http://thebankwatch.com/2007/08/22/banks-editing-wikipedia/#comment-15768</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 17:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bankwatch.wordpress.com/2007/08/22/banks-editing-wikipedia/#comment-15768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks like the site is still getting slammed and not accepting the page specific queries which I think are more interesting. 

It could separate the evil wikipedia editing by banks from the benevolent ones.   If bank associates are modifying their company&#039;s description that seems suspect, but if they&#039;re helping make some area of knowledge clearer.  wouldn&#039;t that be a good thing?

Especially if not even remotely connected to making a company&#039;s image better or helping its business or smearing competitors.   Say like, I just like stats and I&#039;m helping improve some entries...
Bank Associate Brent   :  )]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like the site is still getting slammed and not accepting the page specific queries which I think are more interesting. </p>
<p>It could separate the evil wikipedia editing by banks from the benevolent ones.   If bank associates are modifying their company&#8217;s description that seems suspect, but if they&#8217;re helping make some area of knowledge clearer.  wouldn&#8217;t that be a good thing?</p>
<p>Especially if not even remotely connected to making a company&#8217;s image better or helping its business or smearing competitors.   Say like, I just like stats and I&#8217;m helping improve some entries&#8230;<br />
Bank Associate Brent   :  )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

