<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The G20 ought to consider only regulation that assesses the outcome of good and bad decisions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thebankwatch.com/2008/11/13/the-g20-ought-to-consider-only-regulation-that-assesses-the-outcome-of-good-and-bad-decisions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thebankwatch.com/2008/11/13/the-g20-ought-to-consider-only-regulation-that-assesses-the-outcome-of-good-and-bad-decisions/</link>
	<description>Tracking the evolution of financial services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 18:05:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dobes Vandermeer</title>
		<link>http://thebankwatch.com/2008/11/13/the-g20-ought-to-consider-only-regulation-that-assesses-the-outcome-of-good-and-bad-decisions/#comment-26335</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dobes Vandermeer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 05:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bankwatch.wordpress.com/2008/11/13/the-g20-ought-to-consider-only-regulation-that-assesses-the-outcome-of-good-and-bad-decisions/#comment-26335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t normally agree with W. Bush, but in this case it sounds like he may have a point - prudence in regulation is important.  The issue here is a kind of borderline fraud where these securities were incorrectly rated and insured.  I think a good dose of transparency is important, but using this as an excuse to burden the market with a bunch of bureaucracy would be a big mistake.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t normally agree with W. Bush, but in this case it sounds like he may have a point &#8211; prudence in regulation is important.  The issue here is a kind of borderline fraud where these securities were incorrectly rated and insured.  I think a good dose of transparency is important, but using this as an excuse to burden the market with a bunch of bureaucracy would be a big mistake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

