The Bankwatch

Tracking the consumer evolution of financial services

6 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Typo in headline: “no” should be “not”

    Jeffry Pilcher

    February 4, 2008 at 13:24

  2. This is somewhat contrary to what we have seen with our alert product these last 3 years. The important point is that the end user needs to define the parameters of receipt of alerts and not just offer global alert mechanisms.

    Gene Blishen

    February 4, 2008 at 20:37

  3. @Jeffry: may not be a typo. Colin is Scottish after all…

    Dan Dickinson

    February 5, 2008 at 12:15

  4. Thanks all for the ESL lesson to this Scotsman!!!!

    Colin

    February 6, 2008 at 01:05

  5. Gene… thats interesting. Sounds like what you are suggesting is that people will respond to customisation capabilities.

    Colin

    February 6, 2008 at 01:08

  6. Question: do adopters of mobile alerts skew younger at all? since this is the group that is harmed more by overdraft charges, it seems they would be most likely to use a service that alerts them to potential overdrafts and protects them from avoidable fees.

    Colin B.

    February 6, 2008 at 09:02


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: